Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!island!grenada!christmas!rtm
From: rtm@christmas.UUCP (Richard Minner)
Newsgroups: comp.graphics
Subject: Re: Linguistical question about radiosity.
Message-ID: <19@christmas.UUCP>
Date: 19 Dec 90 04:30:08 GMT
References: <1990Dec12.175732.2383@lavaca.uh.edu>
Reply-To: rtm@christmas.uu.net (Richard Minner)
Organization: Island Graphics, Sacramento, California
Lines: 11

In article <1990Dec12.175732.2383@lavaca.uh.edu> jet@karazm.math.uh.edu (J. Eric Townsend) writes:
>I use "radiate", personally.  "Let's radiate this scene and see what
>it looks like." has such a nice ring to it...
I'll second that.  As for the noun, hmmm, how about:
	radiosopher (radio philosopher?)
	radifier    (like, totally rad)
	radster     (raster + dragster)

-- 
Richard Minner  || {uunet,sun,well}!island!rtm     (916) 736-1323 ||
                || Island Graphics Corporation     Sacramento, CA ||