Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!ucbvax!agate!shelby!neon!pescadero.Stanford.EDU!philip
From: philip@pescadero.Stanford.EDU (Philip Machanick)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Double Dispatching (was: Re: c++ followup: abstract classes)
Message-ID: <1990Dec19.000556.7101@Neon.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 19 Dec 90 00:05:56 GMT
References: <Dec.11.13.41.32.1990.19330@remus.rutgers.edu> <CLINE.90Dec18151352@cheetah.ece.clarkson.edu> <1990Dec18.214229.28951@Neon.Stanford.EDU>
Sender: news@Neon.Stanford.EDU (USENET News System)
Reply-To: philip@pescadero.stanford.edu
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University
Lines: 9

In article <1990Dec18.214229.28951@Neon.Stanford.EDU>, philip@pescadero.Stanford.EDU (Philip Machanick) writes:
|> In article <CLINE.90Dec18151352@cheetah.ece.clarkson.edu>, cline@cheetah.ece.clarkson.edu (Marshall Cline) writes:
|> |> Given N types of Operands, there'll be N^2 `add' routines: Int+Matrix,
|> |> Int+Sparse, Int+Int, etc.
|> Shouldn't that be N! (factorial)?
No, it shouldn't - thanks to Charles Allen for the correction.
-- 
Philip Machanick
philip@pescadero.stanford.edu