Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!cunixb.cc.columbia.edu!md41 From: md41@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Marcus Dolengo) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Reality check: Amiga coverage is not a right, but a privilege Message-ID: <1990Dec17.055249.7684@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Date: 17 Dec 90 05:52:49 GMT References: <1990Dec17.034643.7021@maytag.waterloo.edu> Sender: news@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (The Daily News) Organization: Columbia University Lines: 33 I read the article on the A3000UX in Byte and noticed the authors 1st paragraph said something to the effect "old beliefs die hard" and his were "the amiga isnt a serious machine" etc. Who was he, how many articles has he written for any mag and usually about what? anyone have an idea? The reason why I ask is that perhaps he does NOT know about the amiga as much as he thinks, or as someone suggested "writers know about the amiga but exclude them because of threats from users" Magazines that pretend to be a magazine of "the industry" such as Compute or Byte have no excuse for not covering all the machines in that market. If they do not, they should be reminded that they have: 1: ignored a large user base 2: possibly lied to their readers by stating things that "cant be done" but are being done by amigas.... etc. etc. etc. 3: little journalistic integrity for doing the above, and its readership should know this. One was to do this is to write them letters. Not threatening, not condecending but intellegent, non flame like letters. Id think this would be more effeective than merely saying "they can write what they want" because while it is true, they shouldbe accurate. and by ignoring the amiga or glossing over it, they are not being accurate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o o | This Space For Rent // << md41@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu >> | Amerikkka's Most Wanted \X/ /> <\ | I made up my own mind, now I want a Tshirt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chi Omega Rho Fraternity. Because Co-Ed is better.