Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!csun!news From: swalton@solaria.csun.edu (Stephen Walton) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Lattice vs. Aztec C what of it? Message-ID: <1990Dec17.211726.2788@csun.edu> Date: 17 Dec 90 21:17:26 GMT References: <52153@bsu-ucs.uucp> Sender: news@csun.edu (News Administrator) Reply-To: swalton@solaria.csun.edu (Stephen Walton) Organization: Cal State Northridge Lines: 20 In-Reply-To: mwm@raven.relay.pa.dec.com (Mike (My Watch Has Windows) Meyer) In article , mwm@raven (Mike (My Watch Has Windows) Meyer) writes: >DICE Agreed. The test-it-yourself version of DICE is very nice, and very comfortable for someone who's used Unix. I can't justify using it until Matt puts in in-line 68881 code generation, though. >BTW, I use Lattice. Excellent product, with excellent support. The >latter is the cricital issue. I use Manx. Excellent product, increasingly poor support. If I had the $$ for a new compiler, I'd be switching to SAS/C. (Long time net readers know that I've owned the Manx compiler since it was first released in mid-1986, so this is quite a statement for me to make. I'll retract it in public when things change for the better.) ------------------------------- Stephen Walton, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, Cal State Univ. Northridge I am srw@csun.edu no matter WHAT the stupid From: line says!