Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!news.cs.indiana.edu!rutgers!cbmvax!bj
From: bj@cbmvax.commodore.com (Brian Jackson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Lattice vs. Aztec C what of it?
Message-ID: <16676@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Date: 19 Dec 90 18:01:58 GMT
References: <9012161351.42.13@INSIDER> <7322@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Reply-To: bj@cbmvax.commodore.com (Brian Jackson)
Distribution: comp
Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA
Lines: 21

In article <7322@sugar.hackercorp.com> peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
>In article <9012161351.42.13@INSIDER> sysop@insider.zer.sub.org writes:
>> - Aztec in Version 5.0 is far from being reliable.
>
>5.0d has been completely reliable for me so far.

I'd have to agree with Peter, at least as far as my experience with 5.0d
Aztec is concerned.  I have been using it for a personal project and
it's been fine for me. I use it under 2.0 with the standard 2.0 includes
and linking with the 2.0 amiga.lib.  No problems at all.  But then I'm
not using any of the math libraries, so ....

bj

>Peter da Silva.   `-_-'

 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
 | Brian Jackson  Software Engineer, Commodore-Amiga Inc.  GEnie: B.J. |
 | bj@cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com    or  ...{uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!bj     |
 | "Paradise is exactly like where you are right now, only better."    |
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------