Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!munnari.oz.au!mtiame!jep
From: jep@mtiame.mtia.oz (Jesper Peterson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Lattice vs. Aztec C what of it?
Message-ID: <1990Dec21.032913.8163@mtiame.mtia.oz>
Date: 21 Dec 90 03:29:13 GMT
References: <9012161351.42.13@INSIDER> <7322@sugar.hackercorp.com> <1990Dec20.231335.14446@csun.edu>
Distribution: comp
Organization: Metal Trades Industry Association, Victoria, Australia.
Lines: 19

In article <1990Dec20.231335.14446@csun.edu> swalton@solaria.csun.edu (Stephen Walton) writes:
>In article <7322@sugar.hackercorp.com>, peter@sugar (Peter da Silva) writes:
>>5.0d has been completely reliable for me so far.
>It hasn't for me, but I can believe I did something wrong.  Peter, did
>you download the update or order the disks?  Have you tried building a
>sharable library with 5.0d, specifically the example in the res_lib
>directory of the 5.0a distribution?

AHA! So some someone else *has* had this problem. If you optimise it
crashes and if you don't it hangs, right? This happens to me on both
the sample library and on rexxhost.library (haven't tried any others).
Have you reported this to Manx? Otherwise I'll definitely do it now. 

Jesper.
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USEnet: jep@mtiame.mtia.oz.au            UUCP: ...!uunet!munnari!mtiame.oz!jep
[...] I had to leave out reality to keep the post clean and to the point.
            - jeremy@milton.u.washington.edu (Jeremy York) in rec.music.misc