Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!edi386!eddjp From: eddjp@edi386.UUCP ( Dewey Paciaffi ) Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix Subject: Re: Sluggish behavior of IBM 6000/320 Message-ID: <129@edi386.UUCP> Date: 18 Dec 90 17:06:37 GMT References: <1990Dec17.224518.5188@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> Reply-To: eddjp@edi386.UUCP ( Dewey Paciaffi ) Organization: J.M. Huber Corp., Edison,NJ Lines: 43 In article <1990Dec17.224518.5188@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> bowman@uiatma.atmos.uiuc.edu writes: > > -[ describes a Model 320 with sluggish performance ]- > >My only information about the problem I have is that ps shows a kernel process >using about 98% of the cpu time. (process 514 below) > USER PID PPID C STIME TTY TIME COMMAND > root 0 0 120 13:25:45 ? 0:05 swapper > root 1 0 0 13:26:02 ? 0:46 /etc/init > root 514 0 120 Dec 31 ? 181:32 kproc > root 771 0 0 13:25:45 ? 0:07 kproc > >Ken Bowman I have a pair of 320's and I am getting the same results on the ps. This machine's been up for about 5573 minutes: 11:30am up 3 days, 20:53, 6 users, Runable processes: 4 The kproc , also PID 514, also started on Dec 31 appears to be quite CPU intensive: USER PID PPID C STIME TTY TIME COMMAND root 514 0 76 Dec 31 - 5455:51 kproc However, 'ps av' reveals that the kproc process is not using any cpu or memory: USER PID TTY PGIN SIZE RSS TSIZ TRS %CPU %MEM CMD root 514 - 0 12 4 0 4194300 0.0% 0% kproc I'm not real sure of what this indicates... In my examination of the ps output I did notice this: USER PID TTY PGIN SIZE RSS TSIZ TRS %CPU %MEM CMD root 0 - 6 4668 7600 0 3800 0.1% 47% swapper Wow ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I only have 16M in these machine. Is the swapper really taking up half of my real memory? -- Dewey Paciaffi ...!uunet!edi386!eddjp