Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!execu!sequoia!rpp386!jfh
From: jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F Haugh II)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: '386 Unix Wars
Message-ID: <18842@rpp386.cactus.org>
Date: 19 Dec 90 14:01:42 GMT
References: <276d312d-8aecomp.unix.i386@point.UUCP> <33791527@bfmny0.BFM.COM> <2812@cirrusl.UUCP>
Reply-To: jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F Haugh II)
Organization: Lone Star Cafe and BBS Service
Lines: 18
X-Clever-Slogan: Recycle or Die.

In article <2812@cirrusl.UUCP> dhesi%cirrusl@oliveb.ATC.olivetti.com (Rahul Dhesi) writes:
>For business purposes I recommend SCO.  Although I personally haven't
>used SCO Xenix, I did use Microsoft's Xenix on a number of different
>machines in the past, and it was more stable than System V/AT or ESIX.

I've used SCO Xenix on this machine (a 386) for 3 1/2 years, and it works
very well.  The original purpose for this system was to develop business
software for clients who would eventually be running SCO Xenix.

For clients with no on-site technical experience, SCO Xenix is probably
your best bet.  It's sad that SCO UNIX is in such a sorry state.  There
are no "industrial strength" UNIX ports out there, and I was hoping at
least SCO would have something with all the newer features.
-- 
John F. Haugh II                             UUCP: ...!cs.utexas.edu!rpp386!jfh
Ma Bell: (512) 832-8832                           Domain: jfh@rpp386.cactus.org
"While you are here, your wives and girlfriends are dating handsome American
 movie and TV stars. Stars like Tom Selleck, Bruce Willis, and Bart Simpson."