Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!umich!sharkey!nstar!larry
From: larry@nstar.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: '386 Unix Wars
Message-ID: <1990Dec20.233716.28481@nstar.rn.com>
Date: 20 Dec 90 23:37:16 GMT
References: <276d312d-8aecomp.unix.i386@point.UUCP> <33791527@bfmny0.BFM.COM> <2812@cirrusl.UUCP> <18842@rpp386.cactus.org> <2692@sixhub.UUCP>
Organization: Northern Star Communications, Ltd.
Lines: 17

davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (Wm E. Davidsen Jr) writes:

>  I hate to agree that this is the state, but having tried a number of
>the 3.2 flavors, I'm convinced that if you don't need some feature which
>is in 3.2 which is not in Xenix, and NFS is the only one which comes to
>mind, your reliability will be better with Xenix than and 3.2 I've
>tried.

I disagree.  We run Interactive 3.2 2.20 and have had NFS up
and running for weeks without problems.  With the fast file
systems - NFS really shines --

-- 
       Larry Snyder, Northern Star Communications, Notre Dame, IN USA 
  {larry@nstar.rn.com, uunet!nstar!larry, larry%nstar@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu}
                     backbone usenet newsfeeds available
         Public Access Unix Site (219) 289-0282 (5 high speed lines)