Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!bywater!arnor!arnor!uri
From: uri@arnor.uucp
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Let's collect configurations for Roell X11R4...
Keywords: X11R4, Orchid
Message-ID: <1990Dec20.221149.29007@arnor.uucp>
Date: 20 Dec 90 22:11:49 GMT
References: <589@caslon.cs.arizona.edu> <1615@ulowell.ulowell.edu>
Sender: news@arnor.uucp (NNTP News Poster)
Reply-To: uri@ibm.com
Organization: IBM  T. J. Watson Research Center
Lines: 27

In article <1615@ulowell.ulowell.edu>, mschedlb@hawk.ulowell.edu (Martin J. Schedlbauer) writes:
|> I've configured X11R4 for the Orchid ProDesigner. Here's what I did.
|> 2. Step One involves finding the crystal speeds. For the Orchid
|> ProDesigner Plus (512k) with the ET3000 chip set these are:
|> 	28 25 35 45 65
|> 3. I set it up for 800x600 mode. I actually specified the resolution as
|> 
|> So you get for horizontal timing: 800 850 920 976
|> 
|> and vertical timing, use what they do and tweak the middle two
|> H: 846 850 920 976	and V: 606 600 605 631
|> 
|> It works, but I haven't found it to be substantially faster than X11R3
|> from ESIX.

Let me strongly disagree. I couldn't believe its speed, when I got it
running! On my machine (386 20MHz, 8MB RAM, lots of hard disks :-) it
runs MUCH faster than ESIX Rev.D X11R3. 

I don't know yet what it would look like with TCP support added 
though.

-- 
Regards,
Uri Blumenthal			uri@ibm.com,angmar!uri
======================================================
<Disclaimer>