Xref: utzoo news.groups:26771 comp.unix.xenix.misc:64
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!chinacat!sequoia!rpp386!jfh
From: jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F Haugh II)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.unix.xenix.misc
Subject: Re: remove comp.unix.xenix.misc? (Informal)
Message-ID: <18850@rpp386.cactus.org>
Date: 21 Dec 90 13:42:57 GMT
References: <27770@cs.yale.edu> <1990Dec14.022355.16430@pcssc.com> <1990Dec15.160931.5536@bilver.uucp> <2770BF0B.67A4@tct.uucp>
Reply-To: jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F Haugh II)
Organization: Lone Star Cafe and BBS Service
Lines: 21
X-Clever-Slogan: Recycle or Die.

In article <2770BF0B.67A4@tct.uucp> chip@tct.uucp (Chip Salzenberg) writes:
>According to bill@bilver.uucp (Bill Vermillion):
>>The group that should be removed is comp.unix.xenix and leave us with only
>>comp.unix.xenix.misc and comp.unix.xenix.sco.
>
>The removal of comp.unix.xenix was supposed to be a done deed.
>
>If your site still carries comp.unix.xenix, you are in the minority.
>I suggest you inform your administrator that comp.unix.xenix is an
>obsolete group and should be rmgrouped locally.

How about sending out a fresh batch of rmgroup's to clean up the
groups that should have been removed with the renaming?  It should
be part of the rmgroup/renaming guidelines (are you listening, Eliot?)
that rmgroups are executed again after some time period is up to
catch any people that haven't done the alias/rmgroup thingy.
-- 
John F. Haugh II                             UUCP: ...!cs.utexas.edu!rpp386!jfh
Ma Bell: (512) 832-8832                           Domain: jfh@rpp386.cactus.org
"While you are here, your wives and girlfriends are dating handsome American
 movie and TV stars. Stars like Tom Selleck, Bruce Willis, and Bart Simpson."