Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!crdgw1!barnett From: barnett@grymoire.crd.ge.com (Bruce Barnett) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: GA of OPEN LOOK Release 4 Message-ID: Date: 18 Dec 90 12:18:49 GMT References: <9012172051.AA27674@expo.lcs.mit.edu> <13744@chaph.usc.edu> Sender: news@crdgw1.crd.ge.com Reply-To: barnett@crdgw1.ge.com Organization: GE Corp. R & D, Schenectady, NY Lines: 23 In-reply-to: jeenglis@alcor.usc.edu's message of 18 Dec 90 04:23:00 GMT ytsai@attunix.att.COM writes: > Together, OPEN LOOK and XWIN GWS provide the ... In article <13744@chaph.usc.edu> jeenglis@alcor.usc.edu (Joe English Muffin) writes: > Also, ease of learning != ease of use. I've used Open Look > applications and olwm (not 4.0, an earlier version) and yes, I believe Joe, myself, and several others are confused here. Flame to AT&T: According to popular usage, OPEN LOOK is NOT a toolkit. There are at least five OPEN LOOK toolkits I have heard of, and calling your toolkit OPEN LOOK is confusing people. Sun calls it OLIT. -- Bruce G. Barnett barnett@crd.ge.com uunet!crdgw1!barnett