Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ucsd!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!olivea!oliveb!bunker!wtm From: deforest@hpihoah.cup.hp.com (Martha de Forest) Newsgroups: misc.handicap Subject: Re: health insurance Message-ID: <16433@bunker.UUCP> Date: 19 Dec 90 05:06:47 GMT References: <16343@bunker.UUCP> Sender: news@bunker.UUCP Reply-To: deforest@hpihoah.cup.hp.com (Martha de Forest) Distribution: misc Organization: Hewlett Packard, Cupertino Lines: 42 Approved: wtm@bunker.UUCP Index Number: 12507 > > This ought to p*s off the Libertarians ... :-) > Grumble, grumble, you were right. A few observations on the "** CRISIS IN HEALTH INSURANCE **" > Perhaps the worst part of the problem is that the "free enterprise" > system has been unable to resolve the problem. Competition has not > caused doctors' incomes to level off We do not have true competition. The AMA has lobbied for laws that limit entry into the supply side of the health market. > 1. Universal: All Colorado residents Colorado should expect its needy population to swell. Where there is a service supplied at lower than market rate, the demand will increase. > 9. Funding: > UHICO Trust Fund > Premiums Assessed to individuals, collected with income tax > No premiums below 150% Federal Poverty Level > Fixed percentage of income thereafter to ceiling income > (both remain to be defined) > Credit to individuals for current entitlements (Medicare) > Employers maintain current level of support (transfer current > health spending to wages and salaries) > Federal and State windfall tax receipts into Trust Fund > Tobacco and Alcohol taxes > Does this mean that I have two choices? (1) Work to pay for my needs and the needs of others, or (2) Don't work and have my needs seen after? Martha de Forest deforest@hpcuhb.cup.hp.com