Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!bu.edu!att!cbnews!cbnews!military From: wilson@b11.ingr.com (Jon Wilson) Newsgroups: sci.military Subject: re: Electric warship propulsion Message-ID: <1990Dec17.051438.29694@cbnews.att.com> Date: 17 Dec 90 05:14:38 GMT Sender: military@cbnews.att.com (William B. Thacker) Organization: Intergraph Corp. Huntsville, AL Lines: 39 Approved: military@att.att.com From: wilson@b11.ingr.com (Jon Wilson) budden@trout.nosc.mil (Rex A. Buddenberg) writes: A couple years ago, Navy did some 'blue sky' work resulting in a Ship Operational Characteristics Study (which I'm in the process of cloning for USCG use, but different story). One of the conclusions of the SOCS was that electric power should be used as the prime mover on the next generations of ships. Interestingly, in the thirties the U.S. Navy was a proponent of electric propulsion. The large carriers _Lexington_ and _Saratoga_ were, I believe, the largest vessels ever fitted with it; I think that the _Tennessee_ and other battleships of that class were also fitted with turbine/electric propulsion. I recall the account of a crewman on the _Lexington_ who stated that several men in the engineering spaces were burned, zapped, etc. when incoming seawater from torpedo or bomb hits shorted the powerplants. I know of no other warships that used the combustion->steam->electricity powerplant. In a modern context, it might make sense to revert to an electric arrangement; quietness, plenty of power for laser, particle-beam weapons, massive radar arrays, etc. :-) Does anyone know if MHD generators would be suitable for shipboard power? ______________________________________ | | | Jonathan Wilson | | VMS Systems Support | | Intergraph Corporation | | | | email: uunet!ingr!b11!wilson | | phone: (205) 730-6397 | |______________________________________|