Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!usc!ucsd!pacbell.com!att!cbnews!cbnews!military
From: FQV@PSUVM.PSU.EDU (jim bowers)
Newsgroups: sci.military
Subject: Re: "Computer Models Leave U.S. Leaders Sure of Victory"
Message-ID: <1990Dec20.014401.26597@cbnews.att.com>
Date: 20 Dec 90 01:44:01 GMT
References: <1990Dec19.010219.24876@cbnews.att.com>
Sender: military@cbnews.att.com (William B. Thacker)
Organization: Penn State University
Lines: 13
Approved: military@att.att.com



From: jim bowers <FQV@PSUVM.PSU.EDU>
In article <1990Dec19.010219.24876@cbnews.att.com>, jon@cs.washington.edu (Jon
Jacky) says:
>
>"We are very good at counter-battery fire," he said, pointing to special radar
>to locate any Iraqi artillery batteries that could then be assaulted with
 If radar uses a balistic solution to figure out the location of
 artillery, won't this be all screwed up if rocket assisted projectiles
 are used?  These don't follow a simple ballistic path.

                         Jim  Bowers