Path: utzoo!attcan!telly!lethe!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnews!cbnews!military
From: disc3c1@jetson.uh.edu
Newsgroups: sci.military
Subject: A-12, Australian Carrier? A-4's..
Message-ID: <1990Dec20.015931.28940@cbnews.att.com>
Date: 20 Dec 90 01:59:31 GMT
Sender: military@cbnews.att.com (William B. Thacker)
Organization: University of Houston
Lines: 17
Approved: military@att.att.com



From: disc3c1@jetson.uh.edu
 
 HELP! About maybe, a year ago, there was a discussion of SR-71s, as there
always is in SCI.MILITARY and someone sent me a list of all SR-71s and  i
thought it wsa A-12s in service, and the A-12 was meant to be the attack 
version of the SR-71.. now that I have heard about the Navy A-12, I was wonder-
ing whether I was incorrect about A-12 being a designation for an Attack
version of the SR-71.. Help... also, Can anybody Tell me, will Australia get
an Aircraft carrier EVER??? I wanna be a Carrier Pilot, and I have the option
of staying in the US or goin gback to Australia, but if Australia has no 
carriers, it may be a bit hard to fly of a Carrier that isnt there.. Lastly,
is Australia getting its A-4 Skyhawks back from New Zealand???
Scott Marshall
(Call Fightertown, USA BBS at (713)868-4372 24 hours a day.. I'm the Sysop)