Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!gatech!mcnc!thorin!homer!leech
From: leech@homer.cs.unc.edu (Jonathan Leech)
Newsgroups: sci.space
Subject: Re: Additions to Frequently asked SPACE questions
Message-ID: <18111@thorin.cs.unc.edu>
Date: 13 Dec 90 22:42:31 GMT
References: <1990Dec10.115957.21727@nas.nasa.gov> <4509@wrgate.WR.TEK.COM>
Sender: news@thorin.cs.unc.edu
Reply-To: leech@homer.cs.unc.edu (Jonathan Leech)
Organization: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lines: 12

In article <4509@wrgate.WR.TEK.COM>, dant@mtdoom.WR.TEK.COM (Dan Tilque)
writes:
|>Coming to a concensus on the net can be difficult if not impossible, but
|>I'll try anyway.  Here are some proposed additions.  Anyone have severe
|>objections?  Anyone want to write answers and mail them to Eugene?
|>...
|>	2. Why do the Principle Investigators get to hog their data for
|>	a full year instead of releasing it to me (Joe Taxpayer) who
|>	paid for it?

	I'd rather phrase FAQs in a less-biased way than get
into another big argument on this topic. Want to try that one again?