Xref: utzoo comp.ai:8269 sci.bio:4197 sci.psychology:3919 alt.cyberpunk:5419 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!orca.dsd.es.com!toddler!ddebry From: ddebry@toddler.es.com (David DeBry) Newsgroups: comp.ai,sci.bio,sci.psychology,alt.cyberpunk Subject: Re: The Bandwidth of the Brain Message-ID: <1990Dec22.213121.12226@dsd.es.com> Date: 22 Dec 90 21:31:21 GMT References: <37034@cup.portal.com> Sender: news@dsd.es.com Reply-To: ddebry%bambam@es.com Organization: Evans & Sutherland, Computer Corp. Lines: 37 In article <37034@cup.portal.com> mmm@cup.portal.com (Mark Robert Thorson) writes: >There is a common myth that the brain is capable of enormous computational >bandwidth -- for example that the retina sends gigabauds worth of data to >the brain. I believe the computational bandwidth of the brain is quite low, >low enough that we could simulate a brain on today's computers if only we knew >how to do it. Can we really figure it out? Let's draw a small parallel here for a minute... Given enough time, could a pocket calculator (any model) figure out ON ITS OWN how it works enough to replicate itself? No, not by itself. However, we wouldn't work this was if we were doing it. We'd have a lot of people on the project. So then, given enough time, could finitely large number of pocket calculators (any models) all networked together somehow ever figure out how each of them work to the point that they could fabricate one of themselves? I think not. And the important thing to remember here is that you can replace the words 'pocket calculator' with anything from 'abacus' to 'Cray II' and the answer is always the same. I'd like to suggest the answer even holds when you put 'human' into the question. We're too involved in the problem to figure it out. Just by asking the question, we've changed the situation and the question is invalid. Ask a new question, and the same thing happens. -- "Food to rent, food to borrow. Deposit required." - The Bobs "Bear left." "Right, Frog!" - The Muppet Movie "Maybe it's a bit confusing for a game \ But Rubik's Cubes were much the same." - Chess // David DeBry - ddebry@dsd.es.com - (Multiple genres for a twisted person) //