Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!emory!ogicse!intelhf!de.intel.com!dah.sub.org!ed From: ed@dah.sub.org (Ed Braaten) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: OS/2 is dead? Message-ID: <4036@dah.sub.org> Date: 23 Dec 90 15:21:49 GMT References: Organization: Public Access UNIX System for Landkreis/Stadt Dachau, Germany Lines: 19 In article pete@csc-sun.mckinsey.com (Peter Gaston) writes: >Ok, there's been lots of religious ramblings against OS/2. Personally >I feel that most people aren't keen for IBM for whatever reason. >What I'd like to know, does anyone have a fact base pro/con for >OS/2, esp. w/ regard to it's prime competitor, Unix (and future >derivatives). I don't think OS/2's prime competitor is Unix, but rather Windows 3.0 and its successor... ;-) -------------------------------------------------------------------- Ed Braaten | "... Man looks at the outward appearance, Work: ed@de.intel.com | but the Lord looks at the heart." Home: ed@dah.sub.org | 1 Samuel 16:7b --------------------------------------------------------------------