Xref: utzoo comp.databases:8276 comp.sys.mac.programmer:20167 comp.sys.mac.apps:3199 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!sdd.hp.com!mips!daver!kcdev!genco!rad From: rad@genco.bungi.com (Bob Daniel) Newsgroups: comp.databases,comp.sys.mac.programmer,comp.sys.mac.apps Subject: Re: Is 4d (Fourth Dimension) on Mac better than ALL? Keywords: Oracle 4d Fourth Dimension Message-ID: <174@genco.bungi.com> Date: 28 Dec 90 23:49:24 GMT References: <19464@netcom.UUCP> Reply-To: rad@genco.bungi.com (Bob Daniel) Followup-To: comp.databases Organization: Gentry & Assoc. Excelsior Springs, MO Lines: 47 In article <19464@netcom.UUCP> lpendley@netcom.UUCP (Lou Pendley) writes: >the struggle between Oracle and Ingres and Informix continues onward. what >i would like to pose to this forum, is does Fourth Dimension on the Mac have >'almost' everything the other database systems have, and more, to include: > >a) graphical user interface 4D has by far the best design tools of any other db for Mac. >b) procedural language YES!!!! It even allows pointers and you can write external code resources in C, Pascal, etc. >c) graphical data types, blobs (lookout Steve McQueen) YES!!!! Picture fields >d) complete security There is user level of security to grant access to certain layouts, files, etc. >e) compile to binaries There is now a compiler that improves performance and allows running your application in stand alone form without a runtime. >f) links to other database vendors, Oracle, Ingres, Informix There is supposedly a 4D package that is available from Oracle that will allow 4D to link to an Oracle database. I haven't seen it yet. You should probably contact Oracle instead Acius. >a) not SQL standard Not a major loss unless you need to tie into other platforms. 4D's disadvantage however is that you can't do complex queriers w/out writing a procedure as you can do with SQL. >b) not Client/Server architecture. But is multiuser >c) does it run under A/UX, apples Unix port I heard it does as a Mac application. There is not an A/UX version. >d) currently not portable to other O/S No, and probably won't ever be. 4D is a good choice if you intend to keep your database on Mac. If you have the need to go across platforms, Oracle would be the logical choice. If your going to Mac Expo in January, be sure to check out the Acius booth. They have some slick new products including 4D Calc and 4D Write.