Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!apple!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!casbah.acns.nwu.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: halcyon!peterm@sumax.seattleu.edu (Peter Marshall)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Caller ID in Atlanta
Message-ID: <15632@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Date: 20 Dec 90 19:40:32 GMT
Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu
Organization: The 23:00 News
Lines: 10
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 900, Message 10 of 11


Re: Bill Berbenich's 12/19 post in Digest #892--

"Getting online with a minimum of pre-deployment wrangling" seems
euphemistic and equally problematic. Such a notion of Caller ID trials
also seems to be premised on an all-too-unsceptical assumption about
trials in general, and this kind in particular. It might also be
observed that PUC approvals of this kind can involve an interest in
ultimate buck-passing to the courts anyway. Thus, so much for the
evils of "pre-deployment wrangling."