Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!casbah.acns.nwu.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request From: peter@taronga.hackercorp.com (peter) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: AT&T Mail Update: Internet Gateway Announced Message-ID: <15681@accuvax.nwu.edu> Date: 24 Dec 90 06:00:05 GMT Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu Organization: TELECOM Digest Lines: 30 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 904, Message 13 of 13 In article <15656@accuvax.nwu.edu>, ehopper@attmail.com writes: > * Users are prohibited to use the Internet to carry traffic between > commercial (for profit) electronic messaging systems. I haven't seen this one before? Is this perhaps just AT&T trying to keep people from realizing they now have access to MCI and Compu$erve customers ... and thus are now selling what is purely a commodity service? Peter da Silva (peter@taronga.hackercorp.com) (peter@taronga.uucp.ferranti.com) [Moderator's Note: I doubt that is their motive simply because AT&T Mail and MCI Mail subscribers have been interconnected directly for some time now, and MCI Mail customers have been interconnected directly with Compuserve people for some time now. Neither MCI or AT&T Mail need the Internet to route their inter-commercial network traffic. And yes, I have heard it said -- but can't immediatly put my finger on the reference -- that the Internet is not designed nor intended to function as a switchboard for third parties not otherwise using the net. That is, at least one end -- sender or recipient -- to the mail is supposed to be here on the Internet to start with. It may be stretching the rules a little to even allow routing of the form 'internet!bitnet!etc' and 'internet!fidonet!etc' but that can be done. Both MCI and AT&T Mail reach dozens of other commercial networkd direct, both here in the USA and many other countries. PAT]