Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!anansi.acs.uci.edu!roode
From: roode@anansi.acs.uci.edu (Dana Roode)
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Seagate/CDC drive caches
Message-ID: <2773BE44.23974@orion.oac.uci.edu>
Date: 22 Dec 90 20:12:52 GMT
Reply-To: roode@anansi.acs.uci.edu (Dana Roode)
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Lines: 9
Nntp-Posting-Host: anansi.acs.uci.edu


Is there any difference between the Wren-6 (94191) and Wren-7 caching
schemes?  On quick check of the manuals, Id say no, other than the
size (32k vs 240k).  Does the wren-7 or any other seagate drive
do any sort of segmented caching?

    dana roode
    uc irvine
    droode@uci.edu