Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway From: pays@mars.emse.fr (Paul-Andre Pays) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400 Subject: Re: admd policies Message-ID: <9012291030.AA09729@mars.emse.fr> Date: 30 Dec 90 08:09:29 GMT Lines: 33 Approved: usenet@ICS.UCI.EDU x-attn: jns X400-Received: by /PRMD=inria/ADMD=atlas/C=fr/; Relayed; 29 Dec 90 11:32:57+0100 X400-Received: by /PRMD=emse/ADMD=atlas/C=fr/; Relayed; 29 Dec 90 11:30:24+0100 X-Previously-To: jh@tut.fi, mailmod@ICS.UCI.EDU ReSent-To: mhsnews@ICS.UCI.EDU > > what can be learned fron this regarding academic email provision? to > me the message is that we can and, in fact, should establish academic > admds in all those countries where the local law doesn't prohibit it. > in addition, we should be ready to interconnect them with as many > other admds as practical. for example, the basic rule could be that > we are ready to interconnect with anybody else on pier-to-pier basis > provided that a flat rate network interconnection can be somehow > arranged, ie. we don't want volume based bills. complete approval 1. establish R&D admds as soon as possible the specificity relying . on the potential "customer" base . on some specific services (such as RFC987 gateway operation) . on the transport infrastructure used (ie. as much as possible national and international R&D networks) 2. interconnect with as many others admd as possible . all other R&D admd (whenever feaseable) . all "commercial" admds accepting peer to peer conditions That means in many countries starting lobbying to have this scheme accepted by Academic and R&D people on one hand and Telecom people on the other. I would be really interested to know about the current situation in different countries and may be exchanging that kind of information may help (just by showing that this is being done in many other countries). What about foe eache country having a statement on the current situation and what is being planned and expected difficulties a s o.? -- PAP