Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!srhqla!unigold!kianusch
From: kianusch@unigold.UUCP (Kianusch Sayah Karadji)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp
Subject: Re: WWV vs. The Naval Observatory Clock -- Who's Right ?
Keywords: time standards timex
Message-ID: <50@unigold.UUCP>
Date: 1 Jan 91 05:34:54 GMT
References: <63354@petro.UUCP> <69@rel.mi.org>
Reply-To: kianusch@unigold.UUCP (Kianusch Sayah Karadji)
Distribution: usa
Organization: UNIGOLD, Encino, Ca
Lines: 12

In article <69@rel.mi.org> bob@rel.mi.org (Bob Leffler) writes:
>In article <63354@petro.UUCP> root@petro.UUCP (Petty System God) writes:
>>the Naval Observatory was reporting time about 12 seconds behind WWV.
>>[...]
>
>[...]  i.e.  How long does it for the data to transmit
>through the numberous switches, land lines, satelites, etc to reach your
>modem?  I'm sure that it is different than shortwave. [...]

That could be, but ... that wouldn't make a delay of 12 seconds.

							Kianusch