Path: utzoo!attcan!telly!lethe!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!sun!amdahl!JUTS!rmm20 From: rmm20@ccc.amdahl.com (Robert Mitchell) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: UUCP at 9600 Message-ID: <281u02SX04aa01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com> Date: 21 Dec 90 17:43:10 GMT References: <3920@corpane.UUCP> <4647@disk.UUCP> <18626106.ARN00479@prolix.ccadfa.oz.au> Reply-To: rmm20@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com (Robert Mitchell) Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA Lines: 26 In article <18626106.ARN00479@prolix.ccadfa.oz.au> ccadfa.cc.adfa.oz.au!Uprolix!Dac writes: >(this is sort of a repost, since my article of four days ago >generated nil response) > ... >************************************************************ >* Does ANYONE else have problems running UUCICO at 9600bps!* >************************************************************ > I can only speak for myself; I regularly run UUCICO (1.06D) at 9600 Baud (NEC V.32) MNF, which is effectively about 19.2KB, to the same type modem on a PC running Waffle. Last night I copied one 40meg HD partition to a second partition on the same drive while running UUCICO and downloading a news feed to a different drive. This ran for about ten minutes, and never dropped a bit. I do have a 2630, but perfmon showed it effectively IDLE for the entire time. My spool file is on a hard disk, not ram. Everything is I/O bound. I did not try it with a few compiles running, however... - Robert Mitchell-- UUCP: rmm20@juts.ccc.amdahl.com DDD: 408-746-8491 USPS: Amdahl Corp. M/S 205, 1250 E. Arques Av, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 BIX: bobmitchell