Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!ists!yunexus!shields
From: shields@yunexus.YorkU.CA (Paul Shields)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Lattice vs. Aztec C what of it?
Message-ID: <19404@yunexus.YorkU.CA>
Date: 26 Dec 90 04:32:57 GMT
References: <9012161351.42.13@INSIDER> <7322@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Distribution: comp
Organization: York U. Computing Services
Lines: 8

peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
>5.0d has been completely reliable for me so far.

50.d has only given me one guru.. had something to do with
pre compiling the header files on the MXM.library

On the whole, it's quite a bit more reliable than the 5.0a 
I was using before.. especially in sdb.