Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool2.mu.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!maytag!xenitec!zswamp!p0.f178.n221.z1.fidonet.org!Paul.Fife
From: Paul.Fife@p0.f178.n221.z1.fidonet.org (Paul Fife)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Correct Amiga Assembly Programming Techniques
Message-ID: <6579.277D75B3@zswamp.fidonet.org>
Date: 27 Dec 90 03:17:51 GMT
Sender: ufgate@zswamp.fidonet.org (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 1:221/178.0 - Spanish Inquisition, Waterloo ON
Lines: 16

If you write to the hardware (in assembly) the program will be faster 
(mabye not noticablely - i haven't tried to find the difference) The 

majority ( if not all) of the graphics.library functions are written 
in C as well as being multipurpose while what you write will be more 
specific. My suggestion is to try it with a few situations both ways 
and see what you need to do.
 
                                                Paul Fife



--  
Paul Fife - via FidoNet node 1:221/171
UUCP    : watmath!xenitec!zswamp!178.0!Paul.Fife
Internet: Paul.Fife@p0.f178.n221.z1.fidonet.org