Xref: utzoo comp.benchmarks:280 comp.sys.apollo:7507 comp.sys.hp:7249
Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!hsdndev!spdcc!tauxersvilli!alphalpha!nazgul
From: nazgul@alphalpha.com (Kee Hinckley)
Newsgroups: comp.benchmarks,comp.sys.apollo,comp.sys.hp
Subject: Re: Performance of HP/Apollo 9000/425t???
Message-ID: <1990Dec20.162923.8303@alphalpha.com>
Date: 20 Dec 90 16:29:23 GMT
References: <1990Dec18.222547.17877@pa.dec.com>
Organization: asi
Lines: 14

In article <1990Dec18.222547.17877@pa.dec.com> mok@fortsc.enet.dec.com (Charles P. Mok) writes:
>them too, including myself.  Unfortunately HP for some reason has not been 
>releasing any of those numbers despite the fact that they are a member 
>supporting SPEC's unified benchmarking effort.  Interesting indeed.

I believe they are still waiting for a working 040 chip from Motorola.
-- 
Alphalpha Software, Inc.	|	motif-request@alphalpha.com
nazgul@alphalpha.com		|-----------------------------------
617/646-7703 (voice/fax)	|	Proline BBS: 617/641-3722

I'm not sure which upsets me more; that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate
everyone else's.