Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uunet!ogicse!pdxgate!parsely!twiki!cos From: cos@twiki.PDX.COM (Charles Sauls) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: Re: New Modems, Telebit Fails under impairments in PC Magazine tests Message-ID: Date: 25 Dec 90 18:13:04 GMT References: Organization: Experimenter's Anonymous - Portland, OR USA Lines: 13 > And Windows provides a very large number of OS services such as > non-preemptive multi-tasking and inter-task communications. It > therefore qualifies, in my opinion, as an operating system. > > I will agree, of course, that it is pretty kludgy and that OS/2 and > UNIX are examples of real OS's as compared to Windows, but I don't > think its fair to crap all over Windows just because it happens to > have DOS as its heritage. Windows is not an OS in my opinion because it is not the first thing to load up on the computer. MS-DOS has IBMBIO.COM, IBMDOS.COM, and COMMAND.COM, but Windows does not have any files like that so you can use it as an operating system. In my opinion, it is a PROGRAM, not an OS.