Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!apple!usc!wuarchive!emory!ogicse!cs.uoregon.edu!mkelly
From: mkelly@cs.uoregon.edu (Michael A. Kelly)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: SADE Sucks!  (Or which debugger do _you_ use?)
Message-ID: <1990Dec23.224128.12324@cs.uoregon.edu>
Date: 23 Dec 90 22:41:28 GMT
Sender: news@cs.uoregon.edu (Netnews Owner)
Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Oregon
Lines: 21



Oh, sure, SADE can be powerful.  But its interface is far too crude to be
useful (to the beginner, at least).  I've just been handed a project of
immense proportions that more or less has to be written using MPW.  Being used
to working in the THINK C debugging environment, SADE came as quite a shock.
I mean, here I have a development system that costs about twice as much as
THINK, with a debugging interface about a quarter as user-friendly.

Are there any debuggers out there with an interface similar to the THINK
debugger?  What do you all think about TMON or 'The Debugger', and how do they
compare to SADE?

Thanks in advance,

Mike.
--
Michael A. Kelly                 | "Fish heads, fish heads,
Internet: mkelly@cs.uoregon.edu  |  Roly-poly fish heads,
America Online: Michael792       |  Fish heads, fish heads,
Compu$erve: 73567,1651           |  Eat them up, yum!"      - Barnes & Barnes