Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!fernwood!portal!sv!daven
From: daven@svc.portal.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: SADE Sucks!  (Or which debugger do _you_ use?)
Message-ID: <1990Dec24.041014.17349@svc.portal.com>
Date: 24 Dec 90 04:10:14 GMT
References: <1990Dec23.224128.12324@cs.uoregon.edu>
Organization: Software Ventures
Lines: 24

In article <1990Dec23.224128.12324@cs.uoregon.edu> mkelly@cs.uoregon.edu (Michael A. Kelly) writes:
>
> Being used to working in the THINK C debugging environment, SADE came
> as quite a shock. I mean, here I have a development system that costs
> about twice as much as THINK, with a debugging interface about a quarter
> as user-friendly.
>
> Are there any debuggers out there with an interface similar to the THINK
> debugger?  What do you all think about TMON or 'The Debugger', and how
> do they compare to SADE?

Other than the THINK Pascal and C debugging environments, SADE is as good
as you're going to get as far as interfaces. TMON, TMON Pro, and Jasik's
Debugger have far more user-hostile interfaces.

Well, there is the MacApp debugger, which is probably in a class of it's
own.


-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Dave Newman              |  daven@svc.portal.com        |  AppleLink: D0025
   Sofware Ventures Corp.   |  AOL: MicroPhone             |  CIS: 76004,2161
   Berkeley, CA  94705      |  WELL: tinman@well.sf.ca.us  |  (415) 644-3232