Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!pequod.cso.uiuc.edu!dorner From: dorner@pequod.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Dorner) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer Subject: Re: stdio, THINK C and APPLs Message-ID: <1990Dec27.183436.3786@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> Date: 27 Dec 90 18:34:36 GMT References: <1990Dec24.182548.17958@svc.portal.com> Sender: news@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News) Organization: University of Illinois at U-C Lines: 12 In article <1990Dec24.182548.17958@svc.portal.com> daven@svc.portal.com writes: >>If the data fork assumption is correct, is this The Way It Should Be? How >This is The Way It Should Be! Horse puppies! It would be easy enough to add another file "mode" to fopen (and another flag bit to open), to give you the choice of data or resource forks. I wonder why the library writers don't do it? -- Steve Dorner, U of Illinois Computing Services Office Internet: s-dorner@uiuc.edu UUCP: uunet!uiucuxc!uiuc.edu!s-dorner