Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!ira.uka.de!smurf!urlichs
From: urlichs@smurf.sub.org (Matthias Urlichs)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: Increment (Was Re: Pascal deficiency)?
Message-ID: <0&%[g2.^y@smurf.sub.org>
Date: 30 Dec 90 19:55:04 GMT
References: <47576@apple.Apple.COM> <1530@carol.fwi.uva.nl> <47610@apple.Apple.COM>
Organization: University of Karlsruhe, FRG
Lines: 25

In comp.sys.mac.programmer, article <47610@apple.Apple.COM>,
  keith@Apple.COM (Keith Rollin) writes:
< In article <1530@carol.fwi.uva.nl> freek@fwi.uva.nl (Freek Wiedijk) writes:
< >
< >What happens if you declare empty static and compile the program with the
< >flag -finline-functions?  I do not have gcc for MPW, so I cannot try it
< >myself.  I am very curious what will be left.
< 
< static void empty(int i) {};
< main() { int i = 1; empty(++i); };
<	reduces to:
< Module:            Flags=$00=(Local Code)  Module="main%"(1) Segment="Main"(2)
< 00000000: 4E56 0000      'NV..'            LINK       A6,#$0000
< 00000004: 4E5E           'N^'              UNLK       A6
< 00000006: 4E75           'Nu'              RTS        
< 
<Now...I wonder why the LINK/UNLK are still there. I also used -mbg off, so
<it's not for debugging purposes...
< 
Probably because you didn't use -fomit-frame-pointer.
(Procedure entry/exit code doesn't go thru gcc's optimizer.)

-- 
Matthias Urlichs -- urlichs@smurf.sub.org -- urlichs@smurf.ira.uka.de     /(o\
Humboldtstrasse 7 - 7500 Karlsruhe 1 - FRG -- +49+721+621127(0700-2330)   \o)/