Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!sgi!silvlis.com!jimb
From: jimb@silvlis.com (Jim Budler)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: ResEdit 2.1 & ResEditFixer:  summary (?)
Message-ID: <1990Dec22.200708.19136@silvlis.com>
Date: 22 Dec 90 20:07:08 GMT
References: <39635@nigel.ee.udel.edu> <1990Dec21.200913.2449@eng.umd.edu>
Sender: usenet@silvlis.com (USENET news maint)
Organization: Silvar-Lisco, Inc.
Lines: 35

In article <1990Dec21.200913.2449@eng.umd.edu> russotto@eng.umd.edu (Matthew T. Russotto) writes:
>
>Agreed, but the package is together-- Apple merely isn't sending it out to
>those who are entitled to it.

I must have missed something. What entitlement is this?

You must be talking about some entitlement that I have not
received. And I have owned a Mac since 84, and been a member of ADPA,
and even at one time been a Certified Developer. I miss very much
being a Certified Developer, and AppleLink, but when I left the
company for which I was working, that *benefit* or *privelage*
went away. There never was any entitlement.

The only ones entitled to ResEdit 2.1 are the people Apple
decides are entitled to it. The determination of who and when
is entirely Apple's.

And don't bring up the license fees of the on-line services. These
license fees are for the software *selected by Apple* and contain
no entitlement to any given quantitee. Therefore these BBS's etc.
are sent specific copies of software and specific instructions
on what software they are to make available, and when. They have
no entitlement other than the right to post the same selection as
other license holders.

>--
>Matthew T. Russotto	russotto@eng.umd.edu	russotto@wam.umd.edu


--
     __           __
     /  o         /      Jim Budler      jimb@silvlis.com      |  Proud
    /  /  /\/\   /__    Silvar-Lisco, Inc.  +1.408.991.6115    | MacIIsi
/__/  /  /   /  /__/   703 E. Evelyn Ave. Sunnyvale, Ca. 94086 |  owner