Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!apple!agate!ziploc!eps
From: eps@toaster.SFSU.EDU (Eric P. Scott)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: Questions about the MUSIC capability and I/O performance of Next.
Message-ID: <1076@toaster.SFSU.EDU>
Date: 25 Dec 90 00:21:48 GMT
References: <5147@husc6.harvard.edu>
Reply-To: eps@cs.SFSU.EDU (Eric P. Scott)
Organization: San Francisco State University
Lines: 25

In article <5147@husc6.harvard.edu> chien@ymer.UUCP () writes:
>2. I've tried to use the Nextstation displayed at MIT computer store

>I had put very high expectation on the Next computer (just think
>about: unix system, real multitasking, audio processing  ....) until I
>operated it myself at MIT. I would be very glad and appreciated if
>any kind person tell me WHY IT IS SO SLOW.

I can only think of one OBVIOUS reason:

They're demoing an 8MB machine.
All the MIPS in the world won't make one bit of difference on a
RAM-starved computer.

Welcome to the REALITY of VIRTUAL memory.
(or as D|I|G|I|T|A|L says, "nothing helps virtual like physical.")

If you think the NeXT is slow, look at a PC or Mac under
comparable conditions.

Since the NeXTstations only have 8 SIMM sockets, you have to put
4MB SIMMs in them (or shut down NextStep) to get any sort of
performance...

					-=EPS=-