Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.iastate.edu!sharkey!nstar!larry
From: larry@nstar.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: '386 Unix Wars
Keywords: sco unix interactive wars
Message-ID: <1990Dec22.135120.25475@nstar.rn.com>
Date: 22 Dec 90 13:51:20 GMT
References: <33791527@bfmny0.BFM.COM> <2812@cirrusl.UUCP> <5407@rsiatl.Dixie.Com> <1990Dec22.053728.15660@jwt.UUCP>
Organization: Northern Star Communications, Ltd.
Lines: 20

john@jwt.UUCP (John Temples) writes:

>RAM.  But overall, ESIX seems more robust.  No panics, crashes, or
>spurious reboots like I have with ISC.

I never have had problems like this with either 2.02 or 2.20 - this
machines runs and runs without problems.  Sometimes we loose power
2-3 times a week, and nstar reboots, checks all the file systems 
and comes back up in around 25 minutes (we have lots of file systems
to check)..

ISC here on nstar is very solid - but on the same machine - 
Intel release 4.0 (2.0) is another ballgame --


-- 
       Larry Snyder, Northern Star Communications, Notre Dame, IN USA 
  {larry@nstar.rn.com, uunet!nstar!larry, larry%nstar@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu}
                     backbone usenet newsfeeds available
         Public Access Unix Site (219) 289-0282 (5 high speed lines)