Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!apple!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!virtech!cpcahil From: cpcahil@virtech.uucp (Conor P. Cahill) Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386 Subject: Re: Need Recommendations On 386/486 UNIX systems Keywords: unix, 386/486 Message-ID: <1990Dec23.162033.3287@virtech.uucp> Date: 23 Dec 90 16:20:33 GMT References: <8204@uwm.edu> <1990Dec18.002013.28881@news.iastate.edu> <1990Dec22.143706.4493@virtech.uucp> <358@metran.UUCP> Reply-To: cpcahil@virtech.UUCP (Conor P. Cahill) Organization: Virtual Technologies Inc., Sterling VA Lines: 30 In article <358@metran.UUCP> jay@metran.UUCP (Jay Ts) writes: >One of my clients suffered a direct lightning strike to their building this From my experience this is a very rare occurence (not lightning striking, but lightning strikes causing damage to serial port cards). >Arnet reports that 70% of their cards were returned due to surges on the >serial lines. > >Arnet now includes port surge protection as >standard equipment in their multiport cards. This sounds real fishy to me. Imagine me saying something like "70% of the software developed without CPC standards ends up panicing the system", so you should buy my software which happens to be built with CPC standards. The other way to look at it is that maybe the arnet boards are soo bad that the blow apart form the smallest voltage spike or short. Don't take me wrong. I'm not saying how good or bad the arnet cards are. I'm only saying that lightning is not a major concern for day to day operations of a "normal" system (of course if the system must have 100% uptime even in the worst set of conditions AND the client is willing to pay the price, you can use the extra money to provide lightning arrestors). -- Conor P. Cahill (703)430-9247 Virtual Technologies, Inc., uunet!virtech!cpcahil 46030 Manekin Plaza, Suite 160 Sterling, VA 22170