Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucsd!nosc!crash!pnet01!jca
From: jca@pnet01.cts.com (John C. Archambeau)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Inboard 386/AT
Message-ID: <6591@crash.cts.com>
Date: 29 Dec 90 06:36:02 GMT
Sender: root@crash.cts.com
Organization: People-Net [pnet01], El Cajon CA
Lines: 29

Simple question, which System V/386 3.2 and System V/386 4.0 vendors support
the Intel Inboard 386/AT.  I know SCO Xenix 386 supports this product.  UHC
claims to.  I called our local ISC distributor and it's not on the supported
list of hardware.

I would appreciate a e-mail from anyone who has used an Intel Inboard 386/AT
with any Unix System V/386 3.2 or 4.0 product.

To those of you I don't have a concrete answer yet, I would appreciate e-mail.
Especially from ISC.  Microport tells a colleague of mine that they've tested
it with System V/386 3.0, but with no later version.

Can anyone speak for Intel Unix?  I would think it would work, but you never
know in this business.

Also, keep in mind, my colleague is itching for answers since he has the
Intel Inboard 386/AT and obviously wants to go beyond Xenix 286 or
System V/AT.

     // JCA

 /*
 **--------------------------------------------------------------------------*
 ** Flames  : /dev/null                     | What to buy?
 ** ARPANET : crash!pnet01!jca@nosc.mil     | EISA or MCA?
 ** INTERNET: jca@pnet01.cts.com            | When will the bus wars end?
 ** UUCP    : {nosc ucsd hplabs!hp-sdd}!crash!pnet01!jca
 **--------------------------------------------------------------------------*
 */