Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen
From: davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (Wm E. Davidsen Jr)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Need Recommendation: noninterlace video board
Message-ID: <2776@sixhub.UUCP>
Date: 31 Dec 90 05:12:26 GMT
References: <160@xyzoom.UUCP> <1990Dec28.223119.28402@nstar.rn.com> <1990Dec29.215910.15344@unixland.uucp> <1990Dec30.044046.4617@rfengr.com>
Reply-To: davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (bill davidsen)
Distribution: na
Organization: *IX Public Access UNIX, Schenectady NY
Lines: 18

In article <1990Dec30.044046.4617@rfengr.com> rfarris@serene.UUCP (Rick Farris) writes:

| > That sounds like a great price compared to the NEC Multisync 4D.  Is
| > it a 1124*768 monitor?  How is the quality of the Goldstar unit?
| 
| It's interlaced...hissssssss
| 
| I have seen 4Ds in the $950 range recently -- I paid $1100
| for mine.

  The Diamondscan which sells for about $1k is rated at 1280x1024 rather
than 1024x768. A friend is running them in 1152x900 mode (on Suns) he
tells me.
-- 
bill davidsen - davidsen@sixhub.uucp (uunet!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen)
    sysop *IX BBS and Public Access UNIX
    moderator of comp.binaries.ibm.pc and 80386 mailing list
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me