Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!uunet!olivea!oliveb!bunker!hcap!hnews!119!5.0!Danny.Keys
From: Danny.Keys@p0.f5.n119.z1.fidonet.org (Danny Keys)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: screen readers
Message-ID: <16525@bunker.UUCP>
Date: 29 Dec 90 03:13:56 GMT
Sender: wtm@bunker.UUCP
Reply-To: Danny.Keys@p0.f5.n119.z1.fidonet.org
Distribution: misc
Organization: FidoNet node 1:119/5.0 - Lazarus, Chico CA
Lines: 14
Approved: wtm@bunker.UUCP

Index Number: 12599

[This is from the Blink Talk Conference]

I agree with you completely.  But I got the destinct empression that you 
were chalenging folks to respond to your message.
If there were 1 screen reader whitch did it all, well then, there would 
be no more need to develop screen readers now would there?
Again, it seamed like you were trying to say that your screen reader was 
the best, and that is why i responded.

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!119!5.0!Danny.Keys
Internet: Danny.Keys@p0.f5.n119.z1.fidonet.org