Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!natinst!sequoia!dewey
From: dewey@sequoia.execu.com (Dewey Henize)
Newsgroups: news.software.b
Subject: Re: news.software.cnews, anyone?
Message-ID: <29992@sequoia.execu.com>
Date: 31 Dec 90 20:46:49 GMT
References: <1990Dec29.142103.3886@blilly.UUCP> <1990Dec31.082711.6700@xenitec.on.ca> <3087@crdos1.crd.ge.COM>
Organization: Home for Recalcitrant Hackers
Lines: 23

In article <3087@crdos1.crd.ge.COM> davidsen@crdos1.crd.ge.com (bill davidsen) writes:
]
]  Since this is a diferent name, and that was a good part of the
]objection, I think you can call it a new group and discuss now. That's
]certainly within the spirit of the guidelines (my opinion), you're not
]bringing the same thing up again, there's a major change.
]
]bill davidsen	(davidsen@crdos1.crd.GE.COM -or- uunet!crdgw1!crdos1!davidsen)

My feelings exactly.   The name was a major factor, I believe, and with the
use of .cnews instead of .c, there should be little objection.

There's most certainly enough traffic to warrant the group, and it might
even make some of the Q/A more meaningful in context (nah, couldn't happen).

Anyone opposing the vote being called?

Dew
-- 
| Execucom and I often have different ideas.  THESE are mine, ok?  Ok.        |
|               dewey@execu.com or uunet!sequoia!dewey                        |
|Don't reword the question into such generality that it appears absurd, that's|
|a puerile trick.  -Barry Shein | But this IS Usenet!! - me                   |