Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!csun!kithrup!sef
From: sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan)
Newsgroups: news.software.b
Subject: Re: New USENET header: Language
Message-ID: <1990Dec31.231725.14105@kithrup.COM>
Date: 31 Dec 90 23:17:25 GMT
References: <1990Dec30.205849.1120@faux> <1990Dec31.105011.4815@lth.se> <1990Dec31.195124.1249@looking.on.ca>
Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd.
Lines: 14

In article <1990Dec31.195124.1249@looking.on.ca> brad@looking.on.ca (Brad Templeton) writes:
>You can eliminate the need for a character set header, but you can't
>eliminate the need for a language header.  Well, perhaps with very smart
>software you could...

I think all the discussion that has aroused shows that there's more of a
need (or, at least, desire) for a Format:/Encoding: header field than a
Language: field.

-- 
Sean Eric Fagan  | "I made the universe, but please don't blame me for it;
sef@kithrup.COM  |  I had a bellyache at the time."
-----------------+           -- The Turtle (Stephen King, _It_)
Any opinions expressed are my own, and generally unpopular with others.