Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!att!cbnews!cbnews!military From: robinro@bomber.ism.isc.com (Robin Roberts) Newsgroups: sci.military Subject: Re: Electric warship propulsion Message-ID: <1990Dec28.032354.3718@cbnews.att.com> Date: 28 Dec 90 03:23:54 GMT References: <1990Dec22.033410.22947@cbnews.att.com> Sender: military@cbnews.att.com (William B. Thacker) Organization: Interactive Systems Corp., Santa Monica, CA Lines: 37 Approved: military@att.att.com From: robinro@bomber.ism.isc.com (Robin Roberts) In article <1990Dec22.033410.22947@cbnews.att.com> writes: > >From: sun!portal!cup.portal.com!Eric_S_Klien >The nuke subs have no electric batteries and we have no diesel subs. >Note that this means that our nuke subs run louder than diesel subs >that are running off their batteries. > Eric Klien Unfortunately none of this is exactly true. Nuclear subs do have batteries they even have diesel engines in case of a breakdown in the nuc plant. The U.S. even has diesel subs, just a handful of the Barbel class. Nuclear submarines have a higher minimum noise than diesel submarines because the nuclear plant has to circulate some water even at the lowest power levels to moderate the temperature of the core. The circulating water increases the minimum noise level. Diesel submarines can operate at very low noise levels on battery powered electric motors or no motor at all. Some experiments have been made with what are termed "natural circulation" power plants that can operate without any pumps going at low power levels some of this technology has been incorporated into the later U.S. nuke boats. The disadvantage of a diesel is that when it is charging its batteries it is as noisy if not noisier than any surface ship. It is slower to deploy to an operating area and has limited range. Its range is even more limited if for tactical reasons it cannot operate its diesels to charge. -- Robin D. Roberts | Internet: robinro@ism.isc.com CompuServe: 72330,1244 GEnie: R.ROBERTS10