Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!dimacs.rutgers.edu!aramis.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!nanotech
From: rjenkins@.com (Robert Jenkins)
Newsgroups: sci.nanotech
Subject: Re: Some problems of super-intelligence
Message-ID: <Dec.31.18.42.18.1990.26067@athos.rutgers.edu>
Date: 31 Dec 90 23:42:19 GMT
Sender: nanotech@athos.rutgers.edu
Organization: Oracle Corporation, Belmont, CA
Lines: 21
Approved: nanotech@aramis.rutgers.edu


( I tried posting this idea a few weeks back; Josh, if I succeeded then, do
  not post this. )

Suppose we develop direct brain/computer interfaces.  I imagine this means
that accessing computer memory would seem the same to us as remembering 
things on our own.

Then, if we build computers that can think faster than us, we could link to
them, tell them our problems, then "remember" the computer's solutions.
We could even remember the steps the computer used to reach those solutions.
If we teach the computer to think like we do, how could we distinguish this
from just solving the problems ourselves?

For that matter, we could download all brainstorming, reasoning, and even
judging of alternatives into computers of our own design, then just 
remember the appropriate results.  The bandwidth required for remembering
final results would be fairly small.  The human nervous system would remain
relatively intact, yet people could think (and invent and code) as fast as
the top-of-the-line nanocomputers.
					- Bob Jenkins