Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ora!daemon
From: baranski@meridn.enet.dec.com
Newsgroups: soc.feminism
Subject: society's view
Message-ID: <9012052211.AA13586@decpa.pa.dec.com>
Date: 2 Jan 91 02:30:36 GMT
Sender: ambar@ora.com (Jean Marie Diaz)
Organization: O'Reilly and Associates Inc., Cambridge MA
Lines: 15
Approved: ambar@ora.com


   From: smd@lsuc.on.ca (Sean Doran)
   Date: 23 Nov 90 07:56:20 GMT

   "I suggest that one way to do this is to have either the government or the
   other partner pay normal wages to the spouse working in the home."

Sure, just remember to bill the stay at home for their share of the
work they are doing, and allow any person to stay at home.

Personally, I'm against it.  First thing, the government will tax it.
I'd rather have *more* people working at home, not being paid, not
paying taxes, and being more productive in general.

Jim Baranski