Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!ncar!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!viking!yjkim
From: yjkim@viking.cs.uh.edu (Yeong-Joon Kim)
Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Re: v09i191: popadbug, test for 386 CPU bug
Message-ID: <1991Jan5.223646.29894@menudo.uh.edu>
Date: 5 Jan 91 22:36:46 GMT
References: <336@aplcomm.JHUAPL.EDU> <1991Jan5.000042.19703@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <1991Jan5.044926.14501@eng.ufl.edu>
Sender: nntppost@menudo.uh.edu (NNTP Posting Service)
Reply-To: yjkim@viking.UUCP (Yeong-Joon Kim)
Organization: University of Houston
Lines: 7

In article <1991Jan5.044926.14501@eng.ufl.edu> shelby@sun1.ise.ufl.edu (Scott Preston) writes:
>
>    My SX failed the test of course!  I think all 386s fail this test..is this
>a bug OR, a "feature" since sooooo many have this??

My 16MHz 386SX passed the test. It says, "papabug, OK." And after the
test it runs fine.