Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!sci.kun.nl!cana.sci.kun.nl!merckens
From: merckens@cana.sci.kun.nl (Merckens A)
Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Re: v09i191: popadbug, test for 386 CPU bug
Summary: Passed
Message-ID: <2597@wn1.sci.kun.nl>
Date: 5 Jan 91 12:47:37 GMT
References: <336@aplcomm.JHUAPL.EDU> <1991Jan5.000042.19703@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <1991Jan5.044926.14501@eng.ufl.edu>
Sender: root@sci.kun.nl
Organization: University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lines: 7

In article <1991Jan5.044926.14501@eng.ufl.edu> shelby@sun1.ise.ufl.edu (Scott Preston) writes:
>
>    My SX failed the test of course!  I think all 386s fail this test..is this
>a bug OR, a "feature" since sooooo many have this??

Not all 386 fail this test: my 386SX passes, so not feature I'm afraid...
Arjen.