Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!att!emory!wa4mei!turbo!greg
From: greg@turbo.atl.ga.us (Greg Montgomery)
Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Re: v09i191: popadbug, test for 386 CPU bug
Message-ID: <ic5aV3w163w@turbo.atl.ga.us>
Date: 5 Jan 91 15:17:53 GMT
References: <1991Jan5.223646.29894@menudo.uh.edu>
Reply-To: greg@turbo.atl.ga.us
Distribution: na
Organization: Montgomery Consultants, Inc.
Lines: 16

yjkim@viking.cs.uh.edu (Yeong-Joon Kim) writes:

> In article <1991Jan5.044926.14501@eng.ufl.edu> shelby@sun1.ise.ufl.edu (Scott
> >
> >    My SX failed the test of course!  I think all 386s fail this test..is th
> >a bug OR, a "feature" since sooooo many have this??
> 
> My 16MHz 386SX passed the test. It says, "papabug, OK." And after the
> test it runs fine.
 Mine failed. I have an old Compaq 386s. I bought it when the 386SXs
 were just coming out. Maybe this bug is just in the old 386s??

----
Greg Montgomery | Montgomery Consultants, Inc. | Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A
Internet: greg@turbo.atl.ga.us                 | Home of the '96
UUCP: {rutgers,ogcise,gatech}!emory!turbo!greg | Olympics!