Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!hayes!tnixon From: tnixon@hayes.uucp Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems Subject: Re: CIS & USR DS Message-ID: <3716.27886916@hayes.uucp> Date: 7 Jan 91 12:27:02 GMT References: <49@ns.UUCP> Distribution: na Organization: Hayes Microcomputer Products, Norcross, GA Lines: 30 In article <49@ns.UUCP>, bob@ns.UUCP (Robert J. Mathias Jr.) writes: > In a previous article, I reported that CompuServe had purchased USR Dual > standard modems. I have just found out that these modems are rack mounted and > that CIS plans to only enable V.32 on these modems. It seems a pity that > CIS does not play to enable HST mode. Also I cannot figure out why they > chose the Dual Standard if they only plan on using V.32. When I asked a CompuServe rep about this, he explained that they aren't enabling HST mode for a very simple reason: once they offer a service, it is almost impossible to ever withdraw it or not offer it universally. Because only USR builds modems with the non-standard HST modulation, if CompuServe enabled HST modulation, they'd be locked into using only USR modems, forever and ever. They don't want this! They went with USR because few companies now have rack-mounted V.32 modems, but this won't be the case in the future. They want to be able to choose from a wide range of alternatives the NEXT time they go out to bid on modems, and not be stuck with having to provide a non-standard modulation forever. As to why they chose DS modems rather than just V.32s, it was probably because that was what was available at the time in sufficient qualitities. I'm sure CIS cut a good deal and didn't pay for the HST modulation they weren't going to use. -- Toby Nixon, Principal Engineer | Voice +1-404-449-8791 Telex 151243420 Hayes Microcomputer Products Inc. | Fax +1-404-447-0178 CIS 70271,404 P.O. Box 105203 | UUCP uunet!hayes!tnixon AT&T !tnixon Atlanta, Georgia 30348 USA | Internet hayes!tnixon@uunet.uu.net